![]() Oregon, Vermont, Delaware, and others have seen more modest case increases and deaths with the arrival of winter. Similar patterns can be found in other strict lockdown states such as New Mexico, Washington, and Illinois-all of which are witnessing sharp upticks in cases and deaths despite having some of the strictest lockdown policies in the US.Ĭounterexamples, however, can also be found. On a per capita basis, Californian’s active cases are about 30 percent higher than that of Florida, which has virtually no restrictions. (To put it another way, California currently represents nearly 17 percent of all active cases in the US.)Ĭalifornia currently has the highest lockdown stringency in the US.Ĭalifornia also has the most active Covid cases in the US (by far). On a per capita basis, Californian’s active cases are about 30 percent higher than Florida, which has virtually no restrictions in place. Sure, California is the most populous state in the US, but the 1.4 million active cases is more than double the next closest state, Florida, which has roughly 609,000 active cases. NERupiTplRĬalifornia, despite having the strictest lockdown in the country, has the most active cases- by far. This is just one of countless examples that show there is virtually no correlation in lockdowns/lockdown stringency and lower COVID-19 cases/mortality. The toll of the virus, however, has not.ĭespite the remarkable consistency of the UK's lockdown stringency, the virus has spread at its own pace. But data show the UK’s lockdown stringency has remained remarkably consistent. The aforementioned United Kingdom, for example, is “reimposing” a lockdown, we’re told. However, lockdowns become even more questionable when one considers evidence that suggests these draconian restrictions seem to have little impact in slowing the spread of the virus. This evidence in itself would bring into serious question the ethics of infringing on basic freedoms and fundamental human rights in an effort to slow transmission of a virus. Lawmakers continue to rely on lockdowns and various other restrictions in an effort to tame the spread of the virus, but these restrictions come at heavy costs to individuals and economies: job losses, business closures, depression, drug overdoses, and a massive surge in poverty, among them. Unfortunately, that seems far from certain. Many believed lockdowns might be nearing an end with the announcement of effective vaccines. ![]() The state’s with the lowest “open score” are the following: California (50), New Mexico (49), Washington (48), Illinois (47), Hawaii (46), Oregon (45), Delaware (44), Vermont (43), New York (42), Michigan (41), and Colorado (40). The company’s methodology relies on reporting on nearly a dozen factors- Are residents under stay-at-home orders? Are bars and restaurants allowed to operate beyond delivery? What constitutes an “essential” business?-to determine each state’s ranking. MultiState, a state and local government relations company, has a tool that allows readers to track lockdown stringency in US states. ![]() Lockdowns remain a reality in many parts of the US as well, although many states-Alaska, Florida, Missouri, South Dakota, and Alabama, among them-have abandoned nearly all restrictions. "That means the government is once again instructing you to stay at home." "It is clear that we need to do more to bring this new variant under control," Johnson said. On Monday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson reinstated a strict lockdown in the United Kingdom, citing a surge in infections and hospitalizations fueled by what officials say is a more transmissible variant of the coronavirus. A COVID-19 vaccine may have arrived, but government lockdowns are far from over.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |